LTCY 518
Literacy Education and Technology (3 Hours)
May Term 2008

 

Western Kentucky University

Instructor:  Dr. Pam Petty   Office:  TPH 363
Office Phone:  270-745-2922  Home Email:  pam@pampetty.com 
Campus Email:  pamela.petty@wku.edu Homepage: http://www.pampetty.com 

Office Hours:

Electronic Hours:  Evenings 7:00 - 10:00 p.m. Central

By Appointment in Office

LTCY 518 Challenge Webpage
  START COURSE HERE

LTCY 518 Home

LTCY 518 Course Calendar Dr. Petty's Homepage

Prerequisite:  None

Course Description: Survey of use of technology to promote the development of reading, writing, and teaching and learning via electronic formats. Topics include integration of technology into literacy instruction that supports diverse literacy learners and designing appropriate reading and language arts technology-based projects for literacy learners. 
 

Rationale: The purpose of this course is to present strategies for incorporating computer technology beyond simple word processing in the teaching of reading and writing. Students will have the opportunity to investigate, experiment with and use the following: Hypertext, presentation software, the Internet, educational software, email, web authoring software, and multimedia programs. Students will learn how to design writing assignments that follow the writing process and allow learning experiences to build upon each other and reinforce each other. They will learn how to use the computer's electronic ability to link information together, to create paths through collections of related material, to annotate existing texts, and to create notes that point readers to either other information or other points in the system. Software design considerations will be reviewed and students will learn how to critique their own designs and mass marketed software programs for possible incorporation into their course curriculums.

 

Course Objectives, Instructional Methods, and Assessment:

The goal of this course is to present information on various aspects of literacy education and technology integration in instruction. The course objectives are stated in correspondence to Kentucky Experienced Teacher Standards for Preparation and Certification. The course objectives and suggested instructional methods and activities to meet these objectives are listed with suggested assessment strategies. However, additional methods/activities and assessment strategies that meet these course objectives may be employed. This course will emphasize the role of technology in literacy instruction.  Students will critically review and analyze the assigned readings, as well as articles, books, and electronic sources brought in by individual students.  They will exchange information and hold discussions on a variety methods of providing exemplary literacy instruction utilizing electronic media.  They will examine the many ways that reading, writing, and the other language arts intersect with technology in classrooms in the 21st century.  Technology projects, development of original WebQuests, responses to assigned readings, and culminating events will be used to evaluate student learning. 

 

Experienced Teacher Standards

 

Click HERE for Kentucky Experienced Teacher Standards related to this course.

KERA Elements/Context Addresses
 Goals and Valued Outcomes
 Performance Tasks
Expanded use of Technology

Course Disposition Statement(s)

The teacher recognizes her/his professional responsibility for engaging in and supporting appropriate professional practices for self and colleagues.

The teacher is committed to the continuous development of individual students’ abilities and considers how different motivational strategies are likely to encourage this development for each student.

The teacher has a well-grounded framework for understanding cultural and community diversity and knows how to learn about and incorporate student’s experiences, cultures, and community resources into instruction.

The teacher is committed to continuous learning and engages in professional discourse about subject matter knowledge and children’s learning of the discipline.

Required Textbook

We are using an ELECTRONIC textbook for this course.   You may purchase your 180 day subscription to the textbook at this website: 

http://www.coursesmart.com/9780137132416

Technology to Teach Literacy: A Resource for K–8 Teachers, Second Edition

by Rebecca S. Anderson; Michael M. Grant; Bruce W. Speck

Publisher: Prentice Hall

Copyright Year: 2008

Publishing Date: 2007/04/25

Pages: 312

eTextbook $11.00   (180 day subscription)

Optional Textbook:  (this book can be ordered on-line from Amazon, Barnes and Nobel,  or the publisher)

This book may be of help to those of you who are VERY novice for using technology to teaching reading and writing.  You will NOT specifically need this book to complete any of the assignments, but if you fell like you are a bit out of your comfort zone with using technology to teach literacy skills/strategies, then you will love this book: 
Author: Julie M Wood

Title: Literacy Online
ISBN#: 0-325-00369-6
Publisher: Heinemann   Edition: 1st   Copyright Year: 2004

 

Course Topics:

*     Be familiar with several popular writing software programs and environments and their relationship to the writing process.

*     Locate and retrieve information on the Internet and be able to download and manipulate files from the Internet

*     Connect to and interact with a class listserv and other professional listservs for the purpose of writing about their reading and getting peer feedback (a kind of
         electronic reader response journal).

*      Write, design, and publish web page or multi-media presentation for use in the classroom using annotated texts, paths, and notes to connect material.

*     Understand how teachers learn technology skills and how to help them use technology in the classroom.

*     Assess their own educational environment and develop a written plan for incorporating technology into their curriculums and training others in their buildings to 
        do the same

*     Understand and explain the theoretical and research basis of using technology to increase the literacy development of K-8 students - specifically in the areas of
         word recognition, fluency, comprehension, vocabulary development, reading and writing across the curriculum, process writing, and building background and motivation. 

*     Identify and address the major issues surrounding the use of technology integration in classroom learning and teaching
*     Design appropriate curriculum integration projects for K-8 literacy learners

*     Identify and evaluate Internet sites for use in the literacy education of K-8 learners
*     Collect, bookmark and use many Internet sites that support literacy learning K-8
*     Help students plan, create and produce electronic literacy projects
*      Understand the principles of WebQuests and know how to design them for individual classrooms

 

Attendance and Course Requirements:  PLEASE read this section: 

A.  All assignments are due on time. Late assignments will be penalized 20% of their possible point value if submitted within two work days of their due date. Assignments turned in beyond that point will receive 50% of their graded point value. 

B.  All assignments will be graded for content and mechanics.
 

C. It is expected that you will read and reflect on required course readings prior to Discussion Board Entry. Selected course readings will help you develop the knowledge and theoretical base needed for teaching reading in content areas. 
 

D. Students are encouraged to conference with the instructor by phone or by email, if the need arises.
 

E. All assignments must be typed. Use APA format for assignments. You WILL lose points if you do not use APA format.   (12pt font, 1 inch margins, double-spaced)

F. University policy on academic honesty will be strictly observed.  Please see notes on PLAGIARISM.  

 

G.  Keep a copy of all assignments. If an assignment is lost, the burden of proof that you completed the assignment
rests with you.

 

SPECIAL NOTE:
 

During May Term face-to-face 3-hour courses meet on campus for 3 hours and 20 minutes per day x M-F = 16 hours and 40 minutes of instruction/class time per week.  Typically, in a 3-hour graduate course it is expected that for every one hour of class time 2 hours of outside "efforts" would be required to be able to competently accomplish required assignments/projects/readings.  Needless to say tackling the demands of a 3-hour graduate course in 3 weeks will be daunting for all involved.  Scheduling of your time will be paramount to your success in this course.  Absolutely NO "incompletes" will be issued for this course (barring some sort of documented health or family emergency).  I am including a possible hour/day scheduling scenario that you might find useful in your planning:

 

  • Daily time for reading (includes text and Internet resources):  2 - 3 hours per day
     

  • Daily time for working through tutorials (hardware and software applications will be introduced, practiced, and learned through this venue):  1+ hours daily
     

  • Daily time for working on projects:  1 + hours per day


Evaluation and Grade Assignment:

The final course grade will be based on the following grading scale:

Grading Scale:

A:  370 - 400 pts.

B:  340 - 369 pts.

C:  300 - 339 pts.

D:  276 - 299 pts. 

F:  275 or fewer pts.


Course Assignments and Point Values:

 

1. Participation and Professionalism (30 pts)

 

Active participation through email is mandatory! This also includes

participation in submitting surveys, collegiality, effort, etc.  Professionalism is expected with regard to your electronic

communications to one another and to the professor. Your communications should be polite and professional. All tasks will be explained via email, video, and discussion boards as they are introduced in the course.  Do not try to do this course in a weekend or a week - it will take every day of the entire 3 weeks.  You cannot work ahead of me as we are "traveling" together as a unit through this course. 

 

2.  Expert on a Topic:  (75 points)

Each student will select ONE chapter listed below (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) to become an "expert" in that area of interest.  Send an email to pamela.petty@wku.edu  to request the chapter of your choice.  Then proceed as follows:

7.  Culminating Literacy and Technology Integration Plan (custom designed for your classroom) (75 points)

 

     (rubric for this task)  -

There is ONE CRITICAL PERFORMANCE for this course:   Culminating Literacy and Technology Integration Plan (custom designed for your classroom) (75 points)
This assignment MUST be posted to the Electronic Portfolio before a final grade can be given for this course.  This assignment need to be produced electronically either in MS WORD (doc), in Rich Text Format (rtf), HTML, or PowerPoint (PPT) so it can be uploaded to the Electronic Portfolio and opened by your instructor.  Submission of WORKS files or WordPerfect files is not acceptable.  You must upload the assignment to the ASSIGNMENTS section of Blackboard AND to the Electronic Portfolio. 

You may need to register in the new EPS system before you will have access.  vv

In order for me to submit a final grade for you in LTCY 518 you must upload the Critical Performance (Culminating Literacy and Technology Integration Plan) to the Electronic Portfolio System as outlined below: 

 

Each student will need to register in the new EPS system before you will have access.

Here are the important links to the New EPS system

 

Main Portfolio Page    http://edtech2.wku.edu/portfolio/

Student Registration    http://edtech2.wku.edu/portfolio/student/register.php

Student Help Page      http://edtech2.wku.edu/portfolio/studenthelp.php

http://edtech6.wku.edu/~eps/

 


Disability Accommodations Statement:
"Students with disabilities who require accommodations (academic adjustment and/or auxiliary aids or services) for this course must contact the Office for Student Disability Services, Room 445, Potter Hall.  The OFSDS telephone number is (270) 745-5004 V/TDD.  Please DO NOT request accommodations directly from the professor or instructor without a letter of accommodation from the Office for Student Disability Services. 

Plagiarism Policy:
To represent ideas or interpretations taken from another source as one's own is plagiarism.  Plagiarism is a serious offense.  The academic work of students must be their own.  Students must give the author(s) credit for any source material used.  To lift content directly from a source without giving credit is a flagrant act.  To present a borrowed passage after having changed a few words, even if the source is cited, is also plagiarism. Please read and know that you are responsible for the content on this webpage http://www.pampetty.com/plagiarism.htm

As you begin your first assignments, be sure that you are not crossing the line into plagiarism. It is a serious issue and will not be taken lightly. Please read about Avoiding Plagiarism.


Website Address:

Teacher-oriented sites:

Kentucky Department of Education: http://www.kde.state.ky.us

International Reading Association: http://www.reading.org

Children’s Literature Web Guide: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~dkbrown

ERIC Clearing on Reading, English & Communication: http://www.indiana.edu/~eric_rec/index.html

Booklist (reviews): http://www.ala.org/booklist/

Instructional Framework:  Introduction to Teaching Strategies:  http://edservices.aea7.k12.ia.us/framework/strategies/ 

Instructional Framework:  Introduction to Teaching Strategies

Pam Petty's Education Site:  http://www.pampetty.com 

Bibliography

 

Anderson, R.S., & Speck, B.W. (2001). Using technology in K-8 literacy classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.

Bain, B.K., & Leger, D. (1997). Assistive technology: An interdisciplinary approach. New York: Churchill Livingston.

Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brown, D. (1997). Kids, computers, and constructivism. Journal of the Instructional Psychology, 23(3), 189-195.

Burniske, R.W. (2000). Literacy in the cyberage: Composing ourselves online. Andover, MA: Skylight.

Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C.L., & Kahn, J. (1991). Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and  
              word processing.
Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61, 107-155.

 

Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and

               assessment. New York: Longmont.
 

El-Hindi, A. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. Reading Teacher, 51(8), 694-700. Available: www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=RT/constructivist.html
 

Galindo, R., Tierney, R.J., & Stowell, L. (1989). Multimedia and multilayers in multiple texts. In S. McCormick, J. Zutell, P.L. Scharer, & P.R. O'Keefe, (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literary research and instruction (pp. 311-321). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

 

Galvin, J.C., & Scherer, M.J. (1996). Evaluating, selecting and using appropriate assistive technology. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.


Genishi, C. (1988). Kindergartners and computers: A case study of six children. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 184-201.

 

Hawkins, J. (1987). The interpretation of logo in practice. In R.D. Pea & K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing, 3(34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Iannone, P. (1998). Just beyond the horizon: Writing-centered literacy activities for traditional and electronic contexts. Reading Teacher, 51(5), 438-443. Available: www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/RT/horizon.html

Jonassen, D. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 60-63.

Kamil, M.L., Intrator, S.M., & Kim, H.S. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp.771-791). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kinzer, C. (1997). The challenge of change: Exploring literacy and learning in electronic environments. Language Arts, 74, 126-136.

Labbo, L.D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 356-385. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Leu, D.J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-771). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Maring, G. (1997). Using the World Wide Web to build learning communities: Writing for genuine purposes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(3), 196-207.
 

Mike, D.G. (1996). Internet in the schools: A literacy perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(1), 4-13.

 

Nyce, J. (1987). Conventions in hypertext. In J. Smith & F. Halasz (Eds.), Hypertext '87(pp. 184-199). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

 

Owston, R.D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? In Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

 

Reilly, B. (1992). The negotiations of group authorship among second graders using multimedia composing software. (Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Report No. 14). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.

Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L., & Kieffer, R. (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reinking, D. (1994). Electronic literacy (Perspective in Reading Research, No. 4). Athens, GA, and College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia and University of Maryland.

Reinking, D. (1997, May). Me and my hypertext:  A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). Reading Teacher, 50(8), 626-643. Available: www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=hypertext/index.html

Roehler, L.R., & Cantlon, D.J. (1997). Scaffolding a powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6-42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

Ryder, R., & Graves, M. (1996/1997). Using the Internet to enhance students’ reading, writing, and information-gathering skills. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(4), 244-254.

Siegel, M. (in press). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education.

Siegel, M., & Carey, R.F. (1989). Critical thinking: A semiotic perspective. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.

Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., & Anderson, D.K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

Tierney, R.J., Kieffer, R.D., Stowell, L., Desai, L.E., Whalin, K., & Moss, A.G. (1992). Computer acquisition: A longitudinal study of the influence of high computer access on students' thinking, learning, and interaction. (Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Report No. 16). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.

Yankovich, N., Meyrowitz, N., & van Dam, A. (1985). Reading and writing the electronic book. Computer, 18, 15-29.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Walker, D. (1999, October). Technology and literacy: Raising the bar. Educational Leadership, 57, (2), (18–21).

Journals


 05/30/08 10:56:31 PM          

Dr. Pam Petty
Special Instructional Programs, Literacy
Western Kentucky University
1906 College Heights Blvd, #71030
Bowling Green, KY  421010-1030
Tate Page Hall, 363
Campus Telephone:  290-745-2922
Home Email:  pam@pampetty.com
Campus Email:  pamela.petty@wku.edu
Personal Homepage:  http://www.pampetty.com/