| |
Excellent (45-50) |
Good (39-44) |
Satisfactory (33-38) |
Needs Improvement (<32) |
| CONTENT |
| Statement of Problem |
Clear statement of the
types of literacy challenges faced by students in a particular content
area. Topic is clearly related to a middle/ secondary
school literacy issue. |
Somewhat clear statement
of the types of literacy challenges faced by students in a particular
content area. Topic is somewhat related to a
middle/secondary school literacy issue. |
Vague statement of the
types of literacy challenges faced by students in a particular content
area. Topic not directly related to a middle/secondary school
literacy issue. |
Lack of
statement of the types of literacy challenges faced by students in a
particular content area. Topic does not fit criteria for this
paper. |
| Survey of Literature:
Quality and Reliability of Sources |
Excellent review of
literature from 10 or more reliable and professional sources. |
Quality review of
literature from at least 8 reliable and professional sources. |
Quality review of
literature from at least 5 reliable and professional sources. |
Fewer than
5 reliable and professional sources. |
| Action Research Design
|
Clear step-by-step
description of what was implemented, how it was implemented, the
learning objectives, materials used, and how student learning was
measured. |
Somewhat clear
description of what was implemented, how it was implemented, the
learning objectives, materials used, and how student learning was
measured. |
Poor or lack of
description of what was implemented, how it was implemented, the
learning objectives, materials used, and how student learning was
measured. |
Serious
lack of description of what was implemented, how it was implemented, the
learning objectives, materials used, and how student learning was
measured. |
| Results |
Results are communicated
clearly. Data is included to support findings. |
Results are somewhat
clearly communicated. Data is included to support findings. |
Results are not clearly
reported. It appears that some action research took place, but it
is not clear what the outcomes were. |
There is no
clear link between the action research and the results presented.
Confusion or mis-interpretation/
representation of results. |
Implications for other Middle/Secondary
(content area goes here) Teachers:
Instructional
Practices/ Strategies |
Inclusion of excellent
instructional practices/strategies for content area teachers.
Practices/strategies are clearly related to results of action research. |
Inclusion of fair
instructional practices/strategies for content area teachers.
Some practices/strategies may not be clearly related to results of
action research. |
Inclusion of poor
instructional strategies for content area teachers. Many
practices/strategies are not clearly related to results of action
research. |
Lack of
instructional strategies for content area teachers. No connection
between the instructional practices/strategies and results of action
research. |
| FORMAT AND STYLE |
| Bibliography/ Citations within
paper |
Excellent use of APA (5th
ed)
style. |
Good use of APA (5th ed)
style - 1-2 errors. |
Poor use of APA (5th ed)
style - more than 2 errors. |
Very poor use or NO use of
APA (5th) style. |
| Organization |
Excellent organization of paper.
Excellent use of graphs/charts to display action research results.
|
Good organization of paper. Good
use of graphs/charts to display action research results. |
| Spelling/Grammar |
Paper has no spelling/grammatical
errors. |
Paper has 2 spelling/grammatical
errors. |
Paper has amore than 3
spelling/grammatical errors. |
Unacceptable amount of
spelling/grammatical errors. |